Interview with the Vampire Steampunk Demondaz... - No Sh*t Sherlock

More top quality research from the University of the Bleedin' Obvious!

(Reply) (Thread)

Yep that's the same answer i got and i am rubbish at sums

(Reply) (Thread)

Cheers for the good giggle!

I especially like this bit:

"Instead, humans are modeled as passive receptacles of blood whose cultivation and harvest are left to vampire discretion."

Spoken like a true economist!

(Reply) (Thread)

Maybe, but are these the same people who concluded that the flight of a bumblebee is aerodynamically impossible?

(Reply) (Thread)

lol..ah but it could be argued...hypothetically. that they are going on the idea that once bitten the person turns. If they use the theory that blood must pass from both sides then only those given the 'baptism' by their sire would turn and the growth rate of vampires would be much slower. They seem to be using the idea that vampirism is a virus(aka Blade etc).A vampire in control would only take what he needed from his victim, such as the vampire bat does (dracula. Blood Ties etc).
this is of course based on fictitious ideas The show blood ties worked it out quite well...only one vamp per town as they have strong territorial claims to where they live..a sire and his apprentice live with each other for a few years, then the sire drives the apprentice away to find their own place. the vampire only takes blood when he needs to and only as much as they need. they rarely kill as that attracts attention. they use hypnosis to prevent their victim if unknowing of knowing theyve been bitten and the wound heels fast. In these circumstances well...they could easily exists hehehehe.

as long as they dont bloody sparkle.

(Reply) (Thread)